🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop laws and support services to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially return the bill for further review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries